SCOTTISH SCHOOLGIRL, 15, KIDNAPPED AND RAPED FOR 32 HOURS


Sunday, 2 August 2015

SCOTTISH SCHOOLGIRL, 15, KIDNAPPED AND RAPED FOR 32 HOURS

BY DAVE FINLAY, 10 JUL 2015 12:31The High Court in Edinburgh

SCOTTISH SCHOOLGIRL, 15, KIDNAPPED AND RAPED FOR 32 HOURS

A man who snatched a schoolgirl off the street and subjected her to a horrific catalogue of rape and abuse that lasted 32 hours is facing life behind bars.Mark Armstrong kidnapped his 15-year-old victim as she returned home from netball practice and warned her he had a flick knife and he would use it if she tried to flee or scream for help.Armstrong, 26, strangled the girl and subjected her to a brutal prolonged sex attack in the grounds of a derelict cottage.Afterwards he led the girl back to his home in Dunfermline and continued to subject her to sexual abuse and rape.Advocate depute Jane Farquharson told the High Court in Edinburgh: “The accused only spoke to tell her what to do, to shut up or stop shivering.”The victim’s mother had reported her missing after searching for her daughter. Police who were searching the derelict cottage at Kingseat Road found the girl’s clothing.Only hours later did unemployed Armstrong finally free his captive and return her phone. The girl later told police: “I just wanted to call my mum.”The victim had facial injuries that left her unrecognisable to officers from the photos of her they had been given in the missing person inquiry.Armstrong, of Macbeth Road, Dunfermline, admitted abducting, assaulting and raping the girl between March 12 and 14 this year.He also pled guilty to a string of assault and robbery offences committed against women in the Fife town in the days leading up to the attack on the teenager.Miss Farquharson said the Crown would be seeking that an application be made for the imposition of an Order for Lifelong Restriction on Armstrong.A judge told Armstrong: “You have pled guilty to an appalling course of criminal conduct culminating in violent and sexual offences of the utmost depravity against a young girl then aged 15.”Lady Wise said that as a first stage she would call for a background report on Armstrong with a risk assessment. She placed him on the sex offenders’ register and remanded him in custody.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scottish plans for central identity database spark privacy criticism


Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Scottish plans for central identity database spark privacy criticism

Scottish plans for central identity database spark privacy criticismCampaigners alarmed after ministers quietly publish plans they say echo doomed ID card scheme NHS identity details are to be shared on a central register under Scottish government plans. Photograph: Christopher Thomond/for the Guardian, Scotland correspondentWednesday 25 February 2015 19.08 GMTLast modified on Wednesday 25 February 201519.09 GMT

Shares

114

Comments

112Privacy and civil rights campaigners have urged the Scottish government to drop plans for a new identity database which could allow public bodies, including tax authorities, to share every adult’s private data.Scottish ministers have been accused of introducing a central database by stealth after civil servants quietly published plans to expand an NHS register to cover all residents and share access with more than 100 public bodies, including HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).Public consultation on the proposal, which has faced intense opposition in the Scottish parliament after the scale and reach of the project came to light, ended on 25 February.Critics claim the plans for the wholesale use in Scotland of the unique citizen reference number (UCRN) were extremely similar to the national ID card proposals by the UK Labour government, which were dropped on privacy and civil rights grounds after the coalition took office in 2010.Alarm grew after it emerged the NHS register, which covers about 30% of Scottish residents and is also used to get a youth entitlement card and a pensioners’ travel card, was linked to a new Scottish income tax database being set up by HMRC.HMRC has found it harder than expected to identify every Scottish-resident taxpayer for the new Scottish income tax system, which comes into force in April 2016 as Holyrood’s tax powers increase. The database would be used to find taxpayers missed using current HMRC records.Jim Killock, of the Open Rights Group, said the central database could allow officials in different agencies to access personal data and allow data mining and profiling in future.The ORG said it was striking that the proposals were not being treated as primary legislation and debated fully in the Scottish parliament.AdvertisementThe Scottish plans appeared to have ignored the privacy problems raised by Labour’s ID card scheme and the latest best practice, even though the UK Cabinet Office was acting to address them, Killock said.Because so many government services, including tax and social security payments, now needed to be accessed online, the UK government plans to employ an outside agency to verify someone’s identity securely and privately before they use a government website.After about 200 supporters of the ORG challenged the plans in the consultation, Killock said: “The Scottish government should reject these proposals and review their entire identity and data sharing systems to safeguard the privacy of the Scottish people.”The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, the umbrella group for Scotland’s charities, said it would be pressing the first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, to abandon the proposals. It raised the very real risk of a massive data breach if an official lost a laptop or a database was hacked, undermining trust in public services, said Ruchir Shah, SCVO’s head of policy and research.“We are concerned that [the] Scottish government is being hoodwinked into a proposal that suits public sector agencies but creates the conditions for a scandal waiting to happen.”After tabling a motion opposing the plans in Holyrood, Willie Rennie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, said it was still unclear how much the database would cost or how it would be policed.“Anyone with a liberal bone in their body will find the SNP’s super ID database plans worrying,” he said. “Expanding access to the central register to 120 public bodies and assigning each person with a unique reference number would be intrusive, costly and would increase the power of the over-mighty state.”Prof Alan Miller, chairman of the Scottish human rights commission, said it would closely monitor this project using its statutory powers to ensure it complied with the Human Rights Act and the European convention on human rights.“The increased digitalisation of data, including across public services, brings with it a need to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect our human rights,” Miller said.“We will monitor any expansion of the NHS central register to ensure that the apparent safeguards for protecting human rights contained in the current proposals are implemented adequately and are robust in practice.”Margaret Curran, the shadow Scottish secretary, said the proposal was in keeping with a new culture of centralisation and secrecy by Scottish ministers. “If the SNP government pushes ahead with this proposal, [it] will be entering uncharted territory. Our NHS records have never been used to decide who pays tax, and it is not used for that purpose anywhere else in the UK,” she said.The Scottish government confirmed the extended database would be used to identify taxpayers for HMRC, help trace children “missing within the education system” and allowed streamlined access to online government services.A spokeswoman insisted, however, that the UK government’s approach of using a third party, secure verification service had been rejected.“We have an unequivocal commitment to protecting and respecting individuals’ privacy and will respond to the consultation adhering to that,” she said.“In England, verification of identity for online services is being handled by private companies under contract to the UK government. We do not agree with this private sector approach. In Scotland, we have consulted on extending our existing approach to the central government sector. “If we take these proposals forward, data provided by individuals to service providers would be verified against a trusted existing source managed by the public sector.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scottish justice ‘failing child sex victims’IE HOLLIE


Saturday, 27 December 2014

Scottish justice ‘failing child sex victims’IE HOLLIE

P
Scottish justice ‘failing child sex victims’Jimmy Savile scandal has brought issue into spotlight. Picture: PAJimmy Savile scandal has brought issue into spotlight. Picture: PA

  • by SCOTT MACNAB

Published on the26December
2013
00:00
Print this7 commentsHave your say!Scotland’s justice system is failing to bring enough child sexual abuse cases to court, MSPs have warned, with too many prosecutions being abandoned before reaching a jury.Doubts over the reliability of witnesses means only a “small minority” of cases are coming before a judge, according to the cross-party group on adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse at Holyrood.It said juries should have the opportunity to determine for themselves how reliable evidence is after hearing from victims.But the claim has been rejected by prosecution chiefs, who insist cases always go to court when there is enough evidence.The Jimmy Savile scandal and harrowing claims of historic abuse at the Fort Augustus Abbey boarding school in the Highlands have thrust the issue into the public spotlight in the past year.The MSPs, along with other expert members of the group, have voiced concerns over controversial Scottish Government plans to ditch the ancient principle of corroboration in Scots law, which requires evidence to come from two separate sources.They instead call for it to be reformed and more “circumstantial” evidence to be used as a second source, allowing a more “flexible” approach to cases which are taken to trial.“We would also like to see the Crown put far more cases of child sexual abuse before juries to let them judge the integrity of victims – adults or children – for themselves, rather than deciding that only a small minority of cases should come to court,” the cross-party group states in a submission to Holyrood’s justice committee.Child witnesses are already heard in many other cases involving serious crime, the group says, and special measures can be used to protect them in the witness box like a screen, video link or even a supporter, after recent changes in the law.“If child witnesses are properly supported and wish to go ahead they should be allowed to,” the MSP-led group adds.“In our view the Crown should therefore allow more cases to proceed to court allowing the judge/sheriff and jury to become more protagonist in determining the strength or weakness of particular evidential information.“This is a risky strategy, of course, but we think that, where the basic considerations for corroboration exist, then the court should be the place to determine. This is far more in the public interest than ‘no-proving’ cases where corroboration clearly exists but is not perhaps strong enough for a sure-fire conviction.”The group is led by Conservative Margaret Mitchell and includes influential Nationalist backbencher Kenneth Gibson, Holyrood deputy presiding officer Elaine Smith and Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes.It also includes experts from a range of bodies like Children 1st, Barnardo’s, Stop It Now and the Kingdom Abuse Survivor’s Project.But a spokesman for the Crown Office, which prosecutes criminal cases in Scotland, rejected claims that it isn’t doing enough.“It is incorrect to suggest that the Crown takes only a small minority of cases to court,” he said.“On the contrary, the Crown takes proceedings where there is sufficient admissible evidence.“The prosecution of sexual offences can be complex and challenging, and this can be made more so by the operation of the current requirement for corroboration.”Crimes often take place in private without any witnesses present and when cases are historic – including some committed decades earlier – it usually means there is no forensic evidence left to collect.But specialist prosecutors already identify corroborative evidence from a “wide variety of sources” which is presented in court as evidence, the spokesman added.“We support the Scottish Governments plans to abolish the requirement for corroboration which represents as a barrier to justice for a number of victims of sexual and domestic abuse crime.”PROMOTED STORIES

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scottish Lawyers behaving badly mp4 Stuart Usher Stuart Usher


Thursday, 6 August 2015

Scottish Lawyers behaving badly mp4 Stuart Usher Stuart Usher

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scottish lawyer avoids investigation despite paedo allegations


Monday, 31 August 2015

Scottish lawyer avoids investigation despite paedo allegations

Scottish lawyer avoids investigation despite paedo allegations

A TOP Scottish lawyer accused of being part of a VIP paedophile ring was branded a danger to children in court documents, yet no investigation was ever launched.

By Ben Borland PUBLISHED: 00:01, Sun, Aug 23, 2015


411

Robert Henderson QCNCRobert Henderson QC is alleged to have sexually abused his daughterRobert Henderson QC is alleged to have sexually abused his daughter, Susie, over a period of many years and also allowed her to be raped by his friend, Sir Nicholas Fairbairn.
Ms Henderson first reported her claims to the police in 2000 and then again last year, with detectives now investigating the pair as part of the wider probe into historic child abuse.
However, research by the Sunday Express reveals the authorities were made aware of suspicions about Henderson decades earlier in the wake of his divorce from his first wife, Olga.
It is the first contemporary evidence that has ever emerged to support Miss Henderson’s allegations against her father and his powerful friends.
A report prepared for a custody hearing before Lord Maxwell at the Court of Session in November 1976 states: “The pursuer [Olga Henderson] claimed that the defender was quite unsuitable as a custodian of [his eldest daughter] or any of the children in that he regularly drank to excess, that he was extremely sexually promiscuous, that he was involved in pornography, that he was generally ‘immoral’ and that he associated with people of a type who it was most undesirable should come into contact with the children of the marriage.
“In particular she alleged that [Miss X] who is in the defender’s house almost every day, is a well known Edinburgh prostitute. She also alleged that on at least one occasion in the past the defender had violently assaulted her in front of the children.”

I knew them a little after I called to the Bar in 1987, and I acted for one of the individual’s wives in a routine divorce Susan O’Brien QC

The Reporter adds that the allegations were supported by Mrs Henderson’s parents and by two family friends, “all of whom claimed they were not merely repeating what the pursuer had told them”.
In reply, Henderson claimed his ex-wife was “behaving somewhat hysterically”, adding that “even if he had been inclined to engage in such activities, which he never had been, he was certainly at present in no financial position to do so”.
The papers stored at the National Archives of Scotland also reveal a bitter and long-running legal dispute between Robert and Olga Henderson, who married in 1958.
After the divorce, he frequently failed to pay the aliment set by the courts and once emptied Miss Henderson’s National Savings account in order to buy his ex-wife a Morris Mini.
He kept the family mansion in the New Town while his ex-wife and three children shuffled around various temporary homes, on one occasion even having them evicted from a “dilapidated” flat he owned.
The papers state: “On September 12, 1979 the defendant called without warning at said flat, behaved in a threatening and aggressive manner towards the pursuer, smashed furniture and placed the pursuer and children in a state of fear and alarm.”
The documents even chart a worrying change in Miss Henderson’s personality, from a “bright, charming and intelligent child” at 10 to concerns over a “lack of attainment, lack of interest and frequent unexplained absences from school” four years later.

Related articles

The 48-year-old, who now lives near Inverness, said last night: “Because there is an ongoing police investigation I don’t think it would be right for me to make any comment.”
However, friends have told the Scottish Sunday Express that she is “relieved and delighted” to discover that contemporary evidence exists to support her claims about her abusive father.
Police Scotland has also been made aware of our findings and it is understood that officers have already spoken to Miss Henderson about the new information.
The divorce papers further reveal that Henderson was visited at the family home by a private investigator who found him engaged in a tryst with a “girl” wearing only a negligee.
The investigator wrote: “Henderson said the girl had on one occasion previously stayed overnight at the house and it was their intention to stay overnight together that evening.
“The bedclothes were in disarray and it appeared to have been recently occupied. There were articles of female clothing lying about the room. This was identified as clothing belonging to the young lady in the house.”
Henderson was 38 years old at the time and the incident was used to support his wife’s application for divorce on grounds of adultery.
The custody battle was also settled in Mrs Henderson’s favour, although her ex-husband was allowed to remain in regular contact with his children.
However, despite their serious nature, Mrs Henderson’s extraordinary allegations were put down to the “personal bitterness” between the couple.
The report, by Angus JE Foster, concludes: “If the allegations made about the defendant and his girlfriend by the pursuer and others are true, Your Lordship’s Reporter would accept that they throw considerable doubt on the defendant’s suitability as a custodian.”
Despite the reporter’s findings, Henderson went on to take silk in 1982 and acted in some of the country’s biggest court cases.
He was also a key player in the ‘Magic Circle’ affair involving claims of a secret list of gay judges and other senior establishment figures.
The lawyer went into semi-retirement in 2001 and later lived in Dubai and France, where he died in December 2012.
The National Archives also holds records from Henderson’s divorce from his second wife, Carol Black, although they are not yet available to the public.
Susan O’Brien QC, the lawyer who will head the Scottish Government’s inquiry into historic child abuse, is understood to have acted as “junior counsel” in this case.
In her declaration of impartiality, she said: “You have asked me whether I knew two former members of the legal profession. I knew them a little after I called to the Bar in 1987, and I acted for one of the individual’s wives in a routine divorce.
“I doubt that my acquaintance as a young junior counsel with these individuals of another generation would place the inquiry at risk.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Hollie Greig Hoax One devastating fantasy:A shill test? NA HERE is the REAL truth


Saturday, 8 August 2015

Scottish Independence, Dunblane Child Murders, The Masonic Connection.page: 15<<   2  3  4 >>
log in
join Kester
posted on Sep, 8 2014 @ 06:18 AM
link    I’m seeing tough talk from some who have strong interests in Scottish Independence. I want to know how far this talk will extend. Particularly sincewe now have cops with Glocks wandering around. Are the Masonic controllers of Scotland worried we might actually do something about Dunblane?

stolenkids-dunblane.blogspot.co.uk…

QVS was a perfect cover for institutional physical and sexual abuse, at first, orphan boys and, on and off, over decades QVS has supplied children(with sealed lips) for abuse, “Where the carcass is, there the eagles gather”. They were accessible to ‘eagles’ like top brass military,politicians, Police Officials, Sheriffs, Fiscals and successful business people in Perthshire, and fools like me could be squashed, swallowed up orsent to some island somewhere. They all gather at the water hole. Outrageous you say? There are similar stories from Wellbeck college and Duke ofYork, where names of the famous are well known associations including famous Statesmen. The link is masons, masters of secrecy and deception, which iswhere Hamilton comes in to the story, the weak link in the powerful chain of abusers. Here we have a perfect situation where boys, sworn to secrecyand parents under orders to keep quiet, helpless to complain. Hamilton was unbalanced and had power by knowledge. This is why he was allowed to haveguns. He was in on the secret and knew names of those other paedophilic members. If those names get out even now after 12 years there will be a riotand the press will have a field day! Lives and careers will be ruined! Is this why Hamilton’s file went missing only hours after the Killings? Isthis why Lord Cullen who I believe was a QVS Commissioner, was appointed to preside over the Hamilton investigations? This is how Masons operate, theycontrol everything and their allegiance is to each other. No wonder they want a 100-year embargo on the Hamilton case!

Scottish Independence means nothing if Dunblane isn’t sorted.

Looked for a suitable video, this is what I found, uploaded a few days ago by a YouTuber called Scottish Independence.
edit on 8 9 2014 by Kester because: condenseedit on 8 9 2014 by Kester because: condenseedit on 8 9 2014 byKester because: (no reason given)

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE,WOULD YOU TAKE THE RISK?


Monday, 7 April 2014

SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE,WOULD YOU TAKE THE RISK?

WITH THE CORRUPT NAZI SCOTTISH   GOVERNMENT  JAILING PENSIONERS

WOULD YOU TAKE THE RISK WITH YOUR LIBERTY IF THIS MAN HAS ABSOLUTE

                                                          POWER?

        WHY DO   YOU THINK ALEC SALMOND HAS REFUSED TO ANSWER THE FOI

      ABOUT HOLLIE GREIG

  1.   HE IS TOO BUSY

  2.    HE IS DOESNT HAVE TO

  3.     HE IS A COVERUP MERCHANT

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTTISH CROWN OFFICE CLAIMS IT PROTECTS RAPE VICTIMS!


Tuesday, 3 December 2013

SCOTTISH CROWN OFFICE CLAIMS IT PROTECTS RAPE VICTIMS!

http://robertgreensblog-holliegreigcampaign.blogspot.ch

SCOTTISH CROWN OFFICE CLAIMS IT PROTECTS RAPE VICTIMS!

This is the staggeringly inaccurate remark attributed to the current Lord Advocate, Frank Mulholland QC, whilst discussing the issue of corroborative evidence The Scottish Law Reporter and others have challenged Mr Mulholland over this clear inconsistency in relation to its treatment of the Hollie Greig case.

The article can be accessed as follows:-

http://scottishlaw.blogspot.com/2013/11/selective-evidence-lord-advocate.html

In Hollie`s case, there were in fact no fewer than 29 potential corroborative witnesses, although not one of them was interviewed by the police following Hollie`s detailed account of September 2009, supported furthermore by extensive expert witness documentation. There would have been another corroborative witness, Hollie`s Uncle Roy (Robert Greig), had he not died mysteriously and suspiciously in a car fire shortly after walking in on Hollie being sexually assaulted by her father.

The astonishing and horrifying case of the poor Italian lady whose baby was ripped from her womb on the orders of Essex Social Services has shocked the nation, but has served to highlight what those of us who have had dealings with social services and the Family Court have known for years. Therein exists a terrible and heartless culture that has arisen as a result, primarily, of the secrecy that allows  cruel, venal and often greedy people to act with impunity.

We have experienced this type of conduct in Hollie`s case, initially when Hollie`s mother Anne was forcibly and unjustifiably dragged to a mental institution just days after Hollie had identified the members of the ring that abused her, which included two Aberdeen social workers.

Once the case was gaining public momentum, the two unfortunate ladies were persecuted yet again by Shropshire Social Services, who ransacked and vandalised their home on 3rd June 2010 without any justification whatsoever while the ladies were on holiday. This draconian action by Social Services was presumably taken in order to protect their abuser colleagues in Aberdeen from publicity by intimidating Anne and Hollie into silence.

Legal action was also taken to do so, with another example of the corruption that exists within the Family Division taking place on 1st July 2010. In another secret court, Mrs Justice Pauffley attempted to pervert the course of justice by trying to bully Anne Greig and me into entering the court without our chosen legal advisers, in contradiction to our equitable rights. We faced the judge down, despite her threats and she was forced to concede. The same judge appeared to lose control at a subsequent hearing on 14th June 2011, when she made a thoughtless and offensive remark directed at Hollie.

I formally complained about her conduct at the time and have now done so again to the head of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, who seems to be getting to grips with the scandal within the courts and has just intervened on behalf of the Italian lady and her baby. However, I learned a few days ago that Mrs Justice Pauffley has been promoted!

Thanks to all of you who sent kind messages to me following my interview with Sonia Poulton on TPV last Thursday. Good luck also to another interviewee, Sid Hingerty, who is currently walking across the Midlands on his way to London to highlight the government`s granting of de facto immunity from prosecution to influential serial sex offenders like Jimmy Savile and Cyril Smith. Never forget that it is not who you know, but what you know about who you know that counts in this country if you want to get away with committing serious crimes against children and the disabled.

Best wishes also to the new broadcasters of TPV and to UK Column Live, who have flown the flag for some time in highlighting cases that the government does not want the public to know about. I`m quite sure that we would have heard nothing even about the Italian lady if the Leveson oppressors had got their way in gagging the media.Posted by at 10:32 No comments: 

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE AND ALEC SALMONDS HOLLIE GREIG COVER UP


Sunday, 1 December 2013

SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE AND ALEC SALMONDS HOLLIE GREIG COVER UP

First Minister in missing records riddle over Hollie Greig abuse allegations
Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services0

The Scottish Government is refusing to disclose whether it has lost or destroyed communications records relating to the Hollie Greig case which may indicate when the First Minister Alex Salmond became aware of allegations of sexual abuse, which Ms Greig claims was carried out against her over many years whilst resident in the Aberdeen area.

Last month the Scottish Ministers were compelled by the Information Commissioner to address a series of questions put to the First Minister in correspondence in relation to the case in January this year, the first of which was: “When did you first become aware of the allegations made by Hollie Greig about her being abused by members of a high-ranking paedophile ring in Scotland?”

The commissioner required the Scottish Ministers to respond by today’s date or risk being held in contempt of court.

It was reported in April 2009 that Greig received a payout of £13,500 from the criminal injuries compensation authority, and was described by Detective Inspector Iain Allen of Grampian Police as “a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim.”

Two Grampian Police Officers interviewed Greig in September 2009. No charges have been brought against anyone in connection with sexual abuse.

The Scottish Ministers’ response to the question, issued by the First Minister’s Private Secretary Terry Kowal stated: “Following a search of our paper and electronic records, I have established we do not have a record of when the First Minister became aware of these allegations. Therefore, the information you require is not held by the Scottish Government.”

However, The Firm has seen correspondence from the Crown Office dated 23 July 2009 addressed to the Greig family’s lay representative Robert Green, which suggests that correspondence addressed to the First Minister outlining the allegations was received over two years ago.

“Thank you for your email of 20 June 2009 to the First Minister in which you raise concerns about the handling of the case involving allegations of abuse perpetrated against Hollie Greig,” the letter says.

The letter then says that Green’s inquiry was passed to the Crown Office for response, given the nature of the subject matter.

When pressed by The Firm to explain the apparent contradiction between the two positions, the First Minister’s office told The Firm today only that “we do not have a record of when the First Minister first became aware of these allegations”.

The First Minister’s office have acknowledged receipt of The Firm’s subsequent query asking whether the records had been destroyed, but have offered no direct response, despite repeated requests.

Russell Fallis of the Scottish Government communications team issued a statement to The Firm that said the First Minister’s office “receives a large volume of correspondence on a wide range of subjects, which is answered by that office or by relevant officials” , and added that the Government does not have “any indication that this information was recorded.”

Pressed to confirm whether the correspondence was destroyed or lost, the First Minister’s office has provided no response.

The correspondence questioning the First Minister was sent on 28 January and had received no response, despite a series of reminder letters. The Information Commissioner later ruled that the Scottish Ministers had failed to comply with their obligations under Sections 10(1) and 21(1) of the Freedom of Information Act.

This afternoon the Information Commissioner confirmed he is now considering whether “further action is required” against the Scottish Government in respect of their handling of the original correspondence containing the six queries.

In May, Andrew George MP wrote to Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland asking him to outline the options available to “those many people who remain concerned” about the “unsafe” investigations into the Hollie Greig case.

“There appears to be a lot of evidence and allegations which point in one direction and indicates that this whole case deserves a through review,” George wrote in constituency correspondence.

He adds that “many of the professionals with whom she came into contact…have allegedly failed in their duties or even covered up important facts.”

George was the second Westminster MP to raise concerns about the case, following David Ruffely MP’s intervention earlier this year.
http://www.firmmagazine.com/first-minister-in-missing-records-riddle-over-hollie-greig-abuse-allegations/
First Minister in missing records riddle over Hollie Greig abuse allegations
www.firmmagazine.comhttp://www.firmmagazine.com/first-minister-in-missing-records-riddle-over-hollie-greig-abuse-allegations/

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTT GOES TO HOLYROOD


Tuesday, 8 September 2015

SCOTT GOES TO HOLYROOD

   RSVP TO ALL WHO CAN ATTEND
I feel it will be my final round in parliament involving my petition so could all who want to support me please make an effort to be there in person or watch it on their live webcast.I will be going all out so please (if you can) come join me in the public gallery. Pretty sureKenny the donkey will be there too! My final response will be earth shattering and I am surethey will have some condemning things to say about my submission!
Don’t want to spoil my blockbuster three page submission but I know it will really make them squirm! As it is about time the magic circle got rumbled in the truth I haveto say!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scots rally behind fight against child trafficking


Friday, 7 August 2015

Scots rally behind fight against child trafficking

Scots rally behind fight against child trafficking By Laura Piper on Friday 7 August 2015

  • Share

More than 2000 people have signed a petition calling upon the Scottish Government to provide vital support for trafficked children.

The online campaign was launched on Thursday by leading anti-trafficking organisations and within 24 hours thousands of Scots had signed up backing the call for the Scottish Government to strengthen the Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Scotland) Bill.
“More and more people are signing the petition and we’re very pleased to see that people are responding and care about the issues,” said Chloe Setter, head of policy, advocacy and campaigns at leading anti-trafficking and children’s rights organisation ECPAT UK.
“When it comes to children, who are the most vulnerable of all victims, it is right that Scotland should demand more support for them.”
  (© STV) via STV The wide-spread public campaign follows the third largest consultation on trafficking laws in Scottish history, with more than 50,000 people contributing to research last year.
In 2014, research found that children had been trafficked to Scotland and exploited in domestic servitude, forced labour and sexual exploitation, with some disappearing from care and re-trafficked to a life of further abuse.
Some trafficked children were found to have been prosecuted for crimes they were forced to commit, such as cannabis cultivation. Others had gone missing and were re-trafficked while many more endured years of continued abuse.
Now, ECPAT UK, Walk Free and CARE are asking justice secretary Michael Matheson MSP to amend the Bill to prioritise the needs of vulnerable children before the legislation returns to Parliament for the final time in early autumn.
via Twitter “The bill currently has guardianship for children trafficked from abroad but doesn’t cover all children, or Scottish children who are trafficked in Scotland,” explained Ms Setter.
“Scotland has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to pass leading legislation on human trafficking, but it risks overlooking those who are most vulnerable – children.
“The Bill must be improved to ensure Scotland has the best protection possible for children at risk of exploitation, as well as the most robust criminal legislation to bring abusers to justice.
“We call upon the Scottish Government to recognise the plight of trafficked children and act to put them at the heart of this historic Bill.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Hollie Greig Hoax? HERE’S The REAL Truth About the Hollie Greig Case :: SCOTT WRITES TO CEOP


Sunday, 6 September 2015

SCOTT WRITES TO CEOP


Dear sir/madam,
this is a follow up letter from the one which i was sent in your most recent email.
There are a number of facts that i wish to be considered due to their inacuracy.
These comments are as follows
-The claim that i used TOR
-My accusations not being met with a factual nature
-Claiming there are other investigations pending with no proof
-Claims of a investigation against mr dearman
-the afforementioned children in this case are infact in care of the state
-Accusations of sharing or possesing indecent images of children
-Accusations of illegally obtaining these images
-Accusations of trying to entrap people
These comments have to be retracted as i am not guilty of any of the above. I here by remove your right to slander my character in this fashion. If you had taken time and looked at my factual evidence then you could CLEARY see my screenshots are via tablet using the software (which i did buy from google play) called IP info Detective PRO. In making unfounded accusations in the way i used this software you also bring into disprepute Google and also the company which has made this software. This must stop now.
The screenshots that i have provided are software based and 100% factual. Stating anything else as i have previously stated puts the companies involved in disrepute. It has been stated in the high court in london that the case against mr dearman was never taken seriously or investigated by barnet police or the met. He was additionally portrayed as a victim of one big hoax. So no investigation has ever taken place until i obtained this evidence.
The two children at the heart of this case have been taken into care and thus the government has complete control of the situation. Are you thus implying they are not
capable of undertaking the safety of these children? The software i have used does not in any way take pictures as you have claimed. A simple fact finding mission before making these wild and untrue accusations would of stated that. Furthermore i find your unsigned threats outrageous and completely uncomfirmed. Having no signature on these threats shows me that your claims have absolutely no merit behind them. If this letter i was sent
was produced in a court of law it would be thrown out.
Your actions as law enforcement officers completely ashame myself and put your very actions into disrepute. How can a supposed law enforcement agency behave in a slanderous
manner towards myself as i am a vulnerable adult, with autism and also with physical disabilities. In my opinion you should be ashamed of your actions. As for reporting to my nearest police station (which is 8 miles away) I point black refuse to do so due to the pain
i go through whilst being mobile, as i suffer from arthritis. In saying this CS Sam salmond
apologized on my behalf when in a previous call to the met in london i was told to travel to my nearest station only to be met by two unhappy officers who stated “we have no jurisdiction to help you” Realistically i could of been charged with wasting police time and now find myself in this situation having to explain myself again. You have not taken my wellbeing into consideration.
I hereby give you 14 days to reply and for the second time of asking i still need a signed copy
of the letter i was sent
Regards
Scott Pattinson

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTLANDS SHAME? GOOGLE HOLLIE GREIG


Monday, 25 August 2014

SCOTLANDS SHAME? GOOGLE HOLLIE GREIG

          

 

 

 

 

 

          PAGE VIEWS THANK YOU!

 

           PLEASE SHARE     150 000 

 

 

      without you,  we are nothing

      

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Hollie Greig Hoax? HERE’S The REAL Truth About the Hollie Greig Case :: Scotsman retweeted WildCat ‏@calamiTcat 1h1 hour ago IMAGINE MY SURPRISE 2 SCHOOLS #PrinceCharles ATTENDED #PaedoRoyals #PaedoBritain #PaedoAus http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/sep/02/australian-school-geelong-grammar-prince-charles-dismissed-sexual-abuse-claims …


Thursday, 3 September 2015

Scotsman retweeted WildCat ‏@calamiTcat 1h1 hour ago IMAGINE MY SURPRISE 2 SCHOOLS #PrinceCharles ATTENDED #PaedoRoyals #PaedoBritain #PaedoAus http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/sep/02/australian-school-geelong-grammar-prince-charles-dismissed-sexual-abuse-claims …

retweeted
retweeted 1h1 hour ago IMAGINE MY SURPRISE2 SCHOOLS ATTENDED 1h1 hour ago IMAGINE MY SURPRISE2 SCHOOLS ATTENDED

No comments:

Post a Comment

Scotland’s named person scheme rides roughshod over parents’ rights


Monday, 27 July 2015

Scotland’s named person scheme rides roughshod over parents’ rights

Scotland’s named person scheme rides roughshod over parents’ rights Brid Hehir Posted 24/07/2015 – 13:40Community practitioners, or health visitors as they were known, have been a valuable source of support for UK families with children for many years.
I used to be one, and our aim was to contribute to the health and wellbeing of parents and families, who generally seemed to appreciate the services we offered.
Guiding our practice was a belief that parents had their children’s best interests at heart, and an appreciation that they would do the best they could for them. We trusted them to bring up their children as they saw fit, and supported their efforts in this regard. That they largely succeeded in being ‘good enough’ parents rewarded that trust.
But the universal service that we used to offer has not really been available to families for some time now. This used to encompass providing support during the antenatal period; monitoring and assessing the development, health and wellbeing of all under-fives; the early detection of issues requiring further action, and acting as the first point of contact for all health and child protection issues for relevant children.
That general workload has now been replaced with one that is predominantly related to child protection. The threshold for what constitutes child abuse has been lowered and trust in parents has lessened. If feedback from colleagues around the country is anything to go by, this leaves many practitioners deeply unhappy in their work. They are also struggling to cope with huge workloads, and not enough new recruits are being attracted to the role as practitioners age.
It is therefore disappointing that a new Scottish government measure – the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act – is likely to use community practitioners in a way that will not change their role or relationships with families for the better.  Yet is still being supported by community practitioner representatives.
The named person scheme is part of the Act, which has been passed by the Scottish Parliament and takes effect from August 2016. Under the scheme, every child is to be assigned a ‘state guardian’ from birth to 18 years. This named person, we are told, will have a privileged insight into the life of the child in their care, and have a general interest in their wellbeing. Surely that sounds like a role for parents?  Apparently not – it is going to be another person with presumably amazing powers of perception.  Likely to be a community practitioner for the under-fives, and a teacher for children over age five, this new role will be state appointed. Not only will the person in this role watch over the children, but they will also be watching over the parents.
During the consultation on the Children and Young People Bill, I can understand why community practitioner representatives responded as they did. They want the Scottish government to value health visitors, to appreciate their early intervention role with families and realise more are needed so that a universal service can be provided again.
Although these points were forcefully made, the representatives did not appear to understand how much this proposal undermines parents or how unpopular it is. Community practitioners who adopt this role will certainly not win any new friends. Instead, they will turn into family spies, where the state rather than the parents will become the mother and father to all children.
Writing in The Scotsman, sociologist Tiffany Jenkins explained why this measure was considered necessary: ‘In the last few decades, the family and the early years of a child’s life have been identified, in political circles, as the breeding ground for social problems. The family is fingered as the place where everything goes wrong: poor educational attainment, obesity, joblessness, stress, addiction, criminality, if not intentionally so, then accidentally…’
So the measure is designed to ensure any potential cases of abuse or developmental difficulties are spotted and acted upon at an early stage. Scottish government guidance says: ‘Sometimes children can be in a position of risk or harm without their parents or others being aware until it is too late. The named person is the single point of contact for every child so that no one is left without support.’  The suggestion that a named person should hold a privileged insight into the life of a child that the child’s parents do not, undermines parents who are considered untrustworthy in recognising a problem or acting upon it when they do.
The named person will be expected to assess a child’s ‘wellbeing’ against eight key subjective indicators: healthy, nurtured, safe, achieving, active, respected, responsible and included. They will act as the central point of contact and develop a ‘child’s plan’ for those who need one, to ensure services are coordinated to help and support a child or young person.
Some believe that the views of the named person will be privileged over those of the parents and child – and these concerns appear justified.  The law says that when drawing up interventions, local authorities must ‘consult the named person’, but only ‘so far as is reasonably practicable to ascertain and have regard to the views of (i) the child, (ii) the child’s parents’.
Unsurprisingly perhaps, there has been lots of opposition to this in Scotland.  A legal challenge and a campaign – No to Named Persons (No2NP) – have been launched.  The gist of the opposition is around unjustified interference in family life, and undermining parents’ rights to enjoy a private life in their own homes with their own children.
Parents worry that the scheme rides roughshod over their rights to raise their children as they see fit. They think the state is appointing ‘shadow parents’ and undermining their authority over their children.
Parents, former teachers and community practitioners have expressed serious concerns about the named person, with one saying she had left the profession because of the measure. The police also have reservations about the scheme’s lack of clarity as to what is expected of them, believing it could impact on their ability to accurately assess vulnerability.
Most opponents worry that the initiative is likely to take much needed attention and resources away from children who need it most.  They argue that this new scheme will be wasteful and confusing for everyone, including the authorities, and that the families at risk, who are in need of help, will be overlooked.
The Scottish government is now under intense pressure to revisit its controversial plan.  Hopefully, the representatives of community practitioners will do the same.  Surely they do not want to collude in undermining parents and the trust that is fundamental to how community practitioners work with families?

About the author

Brid-Hehir.jpg

Brid Hehir is a writer, researcher and a retired nurse. She worked in the NHS for more than 30 years as a nurse, midwife, specialist health visitor and senior manager. She has also worked as a charity fundraiser and retains a keen interest in the politics of health and illness in both the developing and developed world. She is a regular contributor to spiked and is a Battle of Ideas committee member.  She blogs at bridhehir.blogspot.co.uk and writes about female genital mutilation and cutting matters at www.shiftingsands.org.ukFurther information

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTLANDS CHILD ABUSE…VAST BUT DONT WORRY LEASKEY HAS DEBUNKED HOLLIES NON INVESTIGATED CASE


Sunday, 9 August 2015

SCOTLANDS CHILD ABUSE…VAST BUT DONT WORRY LEASKEY HAS DEBUNKED HOLLIES NON INVESTIGATED CASE

Vast scale of child sex abuse inquiries revealed PIC OF, SIR JIMMY SAVILLE.

PICTURE BY CHRIS JAMES (34579458) PIC OF, SIR JIMMY SAVILLE.PICTURE BY CHRIS JAMES (34579458) Judith Duffy, Reporter / 00:12 Sunday 9 August 2015 / News
Share 5 comments THE size and scope of the unprecedented number of inquiries into historical child abuse in the UK can be revealed for the first time today following a Sunday Herald investigation.
The Sunday Herald has learned that there are currently 14 major police operations, four public inquiries and six other investigations – including probes by the BBC, the police watchdog, and two government departments – are either ongoing or have been carried out to date.
Although, full details on cost are impossible to gather at this stage, it has been uncovered that nearly £66 million has or is being spent on half of the investigations.
Last week, Edward Heath became the latest high-profile figure to be linked to sex abuse allegations, with seven police forces alone investigating the former prime minister.
Gabrielle Shaw, chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC), said they were not surprised by the scale of the investigations into abuse.
“Society in general is waking up to the true scale and scope of the issue of child sexual abuse and exploitation,” she said.
“We have been going for almost 20 years and the main service that NAPAC offers is a confidential telephone helpline where people can call in for a number of different reasons.

Promoted stories

Recommended by “A large part of it is they want to disclose their experiences and we have heard many high profile names – so in terms of the fact it is high profile people that is coming to light now, it is not a surprise to us – and nor is the scale and scope of it.”
The Sunday Herald was able to obtain costs for half of the investigations which are or have taken place. The figures ranges from the estimated £20 million which will be spent on the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry to £17,140 which had been spent by April 2015 on Operation Garford, which is examining historic abuse allegations centred on schools in Suffolk.
An inquiry by the Government of Ireland into institutional abuse in 1999, which took 10 years to complete, cost around £70 million. The Royal Commission in Australia, which began investigating institutional child sex abuse two years ago and is due to complete in 2017, has a budget of around £180 million until next year.
Shaw pointed out it was important to recognise the toll on the victims and survivors when considering the cost of investigating abuse cases.
“There is the personal and emotional cost, but also we know adults who were victims of child sexual abuse are overrepresented in statistics on issues such as suicide, mental health, drug and alcohol abuse and homelessness,” she said.
“So what cost is that to society? If we can prevent that in the first instance it has to be better for everyone.
“We know that what most survivors want is the truth and surely there can’t be a price on that.”
The police investigations are being co-ordinated by Operation Hydrant, led by the National Police Chief’s Council. In May, it released figures that revealed more than 1,400 men are being investigated by forces across the UK over allegations of historical sexual abuse.
Share article At that time Police Scotland said it was investigating 110 suspects including 37 high-profile figures. The cases date as far back as 1947 to 2013. The force has said it is not investigating any allegations linked to Edward Heath.
A Police Scotland spokesman added: “We fully recognise that it is often a number of years before victims feel able to report such crimes, and would wish to give reassurance that these reports will be treated seriously regardless of the passage of time or status of the perpetrator.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

SCOTLAND THE NONCELAND RAP FROM RUSTY


Monday, 26 May 2014

SCOTLAND THE NONCELAND RAP FROM RUSTY

Rusty with all the time in the world has written a rap entitled

“The Nonceland Rap” which he has asked me to publish which I do here:

WARNING EXPLICIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://paulmalpas.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Hollie Greig Hoax One devastating fantasy:A shill test? NA HERE is the REAL truth


Sunday, 30 August 2015

Scotland left in the dark over how juries operate, warns prosecutorWritten by Alan Robertson on 27 April 2015 in News Head of National Sexual Crimes Unit underlines importance of jury research
Sheriff Court Members of the Scottish public have been left with “absolutely no idea” as to how juries in some of the most serious cases are reaching verdicts, one of the country’s top prosecutors has warned.
Advocate depute Kath Harper, who heads up the National Sexual Crimes Unit in the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), suggested further research is needed given the lack of insight into how jurors approach complex cases such as those involving sexual crimes.
Academic research into the process of decision-making of juries in criminal trials within the UK has been largely limited amid concerns about protecting the secrecy of deliberations.
Former High Court judge Lord Bonomy last week called for research into jury reasoning and decision-making as part of his review on safeguards in the event of the corroboration requirement being abolished.
This work, which it is estimated could take up to two years, would then be used to inform any changes to jury size, majority and verdicts, argued Lord Bonomy’s report.
“We simply do not know [how juries are reaching decisions],” Harper told Holyrood. “I think other countries – Australia, New Zealand, I think possibly America too – they can interview jurors.
“But we have absolutely no idea how juries are thinking [and] how they’re approaching their task.
“I think it’s something that would assist everybody to know how juries think about these matters.”
The Ministry of Justice last year rejected a Law Commission recommendation to reform section 8 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, which is seen by many to inhibit research.     
Harper’s comments echo those of former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini, who has urged further research to ensure individuals with conditions such as learning disabilities are able to contribute fully to the justice process.
Delivering the inaugural Victim Support Scotland lecture in February, Dame Elish warned that little is known about the challenges conditions such as dyslexia, dysgraphia and dyscalculia pose for jurors sitting through court trials and subsequently how verdicts are reached. FFS
“These are factors which we just are oblivious to during the course of a trial and the trial takes place with people having these,” she later told Holyrood.
“What I think is important is for us to know, to understand what the dynamic is of that process.
“And I think in the 21st century not to go there and to rely on American research of which there is huge quantities of research in relation to jury dynamics and how the jury operate, to me is something which I think now is difficult to justify and that there is a need to begin to research.”

No comments:

Post a Comment