SCOTTISH SOV ON ROBERTS ARREST AND SOME RATS
Robert Green jailed for Breach of Peace & bail conditions
By Anonymous, submitted on Sat, 18/02/2012 – 12:10Claims of COVER UP as Judge jails anti abuse campaigner for ONE YEAR to justify £1/2 million cost of trial started by ex Lord Advocate AngioliniAnti abuse campaigner Robert Green is sentenced to ONE YEAR in jail for handing out leaflets calling for abuse inquiry. IN what many legal observers have branded a STAGGERING decision, Sheriff Principal Edward Bowen sitting at Stonehaven Sheriff Court earlier today took the unprecedented step of jailing the well known anti-abuse campaigner Robert Green to ONE YEAR in prison, for a ‘crime’ which can be traced back to Green’s arrest in February 2010 by Grampian Police officers on orders from the Crown Office for the heinous offence of attempting to hand out leaflets calling for an inquiry into allegations of child abuse raised by downs syndrome victim Hollie Greig and her mother, Anne Greig who were forced to flee Aberdeen some years ago after Grampian Police and Scotland’s Crown Office refused to investigate allegations of child abuse by an alleged paedophile gang based in the area.The stiff sentence issued by Sheriff Bowen, who, it is claimed, failed to declare relationships with key figures central to the case which included the now former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini DBE QC (née McPhilomy) brings to a close for now, Scotland’s most expensive ever Breach of the Peace trial which saw a record HALF A MILLION POUNDS spent on the investigation & trial of Mr Green, a case which tunnelled through the Scottish Courts system for over two years at huge cost to taxpayers.A legal insider speaking this evening to Scottish Law Reporter branded the one year sentence as “excessive”, putting it down to the judge needing to justify the enormous amount of money & effort spent on bringing Mr Green to trial.He said : “The sentence has little to do with justice, rather it appears more to do with the Crown Office, Police, the Court Service and a collection of questionably motivated ‘others’ needing to take someone’s head off to justify the enormous amount of taxpayers money they have spent on their vindictive pursuit of Mr Green.”The record spend of at least half a million pounds on the case included FIFTEEN PRE TRIAL HEARINGS at Stonehaven Sheriff Court, 18,000 travel miles for the accused, trips by Grampian Police Officers to England to search & raid homes & seize property including computers & documents, Crown Office staff being flown into Aberdeen especially for the case, and a witness list which at one point totalled SIXTY ONE persons.The Hollie Demands Justice campaign issued a Press Release, stating it very much regrets the decision today of the Sheriff Court in Stonehaven to deprive Robert Green of his Liberty.The Hollie Demands Justice campaign said : “Despite breaches of Mr Green’s human rights and repeated irregularities in law and process by the police, the legal profession and the court system since Robert Green was first arrested in February 2010, the Sheriff Court in Stonehaven, Sheriff Principle Edward Bowen saw fit to curtail his freedom, sentencing him to 1 year in jail (9 months for Breach of the Peace, 3 months for Breach of Bail conditions).”“Robert has been a most robust and valued campaigner on behalf of Hollie Greig and her mother Anne, in seeking justice for the wrongs inflicted upon Hollie, exposing the lack of a duty of care from those in positions of trust, the perjury of Grampian Police and highlighting the nefarious nature of the legal system and the Establishment in both Scotland and England.”Speaking in response to the sentencing of Mr Green, Annie Greig, the mother of Hollie said : “Hollie and I would like to publicly thank Robert Green for his bravery, his tireless work and his dedication to Hollies cause, her search for justice. We consider ourselves most fortunate to have found such a man of principle to act and campaign on our behalf, whose selfless actions have taken him into conflict with those who would abuse their power and powerful connections to evade justice. Our disappointment with the legal system in Scotland now knows no bounds. In our opinion Robert Green should be awarded a medal, not a criminal conviction.”Mrs Greig continued : “It is our hope that Robert’s legal team will mount a speedy and energetic appeal on his behalf to release him from this enforced loss of his liberty that he most certainly does not deserve and we now state publicly that we will have fears for his well-being whilst in prison. We will hold responsible and accountable those who have seen fit to incarcerate him should any interference with his being or any harm befall him.”“I would like to thank all the wonderful people who have supported Hollie, Robert and myself during this long and ongoing campaign, especially those who have repeatedly made the long trip to Scotland regularly giving support to Robert during his many hearings. Both Hollie and myself extend our heartfelt wishes, our thoughts and our prayers are with Robert today.”Speaking to one of our reporters late today, a Crown Office spokesperson commented : “Following a trial on summary complaint at Stonehaven Sheriff Court, George Robert Green (27/03/46) was convicted of breach of the peace and breaches of bail. Sentencing is a matter for the court.”However, the Judiciary for Scotland declined to comment to one of our journalists, a spokesperson stating : “The Judicial Office does not comment on individual cases.” No sentencing statement has been released from the Scottish Court Service.No statement has yet been released by Green’s defence team on their further plans, which many expect to include an appeal. However, one observer to the trial told Scottish Law Reporter tonight : “Robert’s jail sentence for daring to stand up to the powers that be is nothing short of evil.”He continued : “How can it be that someone who campaigns on behalf of a little girl who the authorities appear to agree was abused, gets sent to jail, while the same authorities have never bothered to fully investigate the allegations or arrest anyone for committing the abuse they themselves say took place.”A reminder of previous events in the trial of anti abuse campaigner Robert Green can be viewed in earlier coverage by Scottish Law Reporter HERE and further coverage of the Hollie Greig case along with a recent investigation into the knighthood of Angiolini, apparently recommended by the Scottish Government.Sheriff in £1/2Million trial of anti abuse campaigner failed to declare relationship with Lord Advocate on Northern Lighthouse Board ‘lawyers club’ . Sheriff Principal Edward Bowen who heard Scotland’s most expensive ever Breach of the Peace trial of anti abuse campaigner Robert Green and subsequently found Mr Green guilty of committing a breach of the peace over an attempt to hand out leaflets in Aberdeen during February 2010, is today alleged to have failed to declare a relevant relationship with one of the central characters of the trial, former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini DBE QC who served as a Commissioner along with Sheriff Principal Bowen on the Northern Lighthouse Board together with a large, if curious gathering of senior members of the legal profession, the judiciary & prosecutors which includes the current boss of the Crown Office, Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland, and his deputy, the Solicitor General, Lesley Thomson.Former Lord Advocate now Dame Elish Angiolini employed Cayman Islands hopping lawyers from Glasgow. Reporting on the background of the case, Robert Green was arrested by Police on 12th February 2010 in relation to a breach of the peace alleged to have been committed in Aberdeen when Mr Green attempted to hand out leaflets regarding the anti-abuse campaign. It was also revealed the then Lord Advocate, now Dame Elish Angiolini had employed private law firm Levy McRae to serve interdicts on Mr Green in connection with his campaign to ‘out’ alleged abusers of downs syndrome victim Hollie Greig. Glasgow law firm Levy McRae who later represented shamed former Glasgow City Council Boss & Cocaine addict Steven Purcell, proceeded to threaten several media outlets & journalists over their reporting of the case, covered by Scottish Law Reporter HERE & HERE. The Glasgow City Council Purcell cocaine scandal caused some newspapers to ‘evaluate’ their relationship with Levy McRae, details of which were featured in a report here : HERE.Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill worked at, has ties to same law firm used by then Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini in interdict case. As details of the case began to be reported in the wider press, it emerged the Scottish Justice Secretary, Kenny MacAskill had links to LEVY MCRAE, the law firm employed by the then Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini in legal action against Mr Green. Mr MacAskill has made no comment on the fact he served his apprenticeship at Levy McRae and also worked at the firm for a considerable time during his years as a solicitor before he entered politics, while he is thought to have backed Dame Angiolini in her actions at the time. The revelations were reported by Scottish Law Reporter at the time, HERE.
why doesn’t Green and his supporters launch a private prosecution and present his prrof to a court?
I have watched every video and although Green makes a sympathetic case he presents no proof.
I also abhor this idea that a person accuses a number of “powerful” people of such a serious crime and then demands they prove they didn’t do it which is what Green has done.26/02/2012 – 15:402
Robb Ryder on James Madison’s talkshoe call 2/20/12
Discusses the fact that a man who was scheduled to be sentenced in a Michigan court on 2/20, sent them a Plea of the Crown in advance of the hearing. He never made it inside the courtroom. His lawyer intercepted him and told him the case was dismissed. Rob: we need to change the wording so that the charges are discharged, not dismissed. We need to know that these remedies exist in the court of Exchequer, and demand that they give them to us. The Chief Justice of the Circuit court (in Michigan) is the Chancellor. He’s over the court of exchequer, the court of common pleas, and chancery. He has jurisdiction over common law, equity, and natural law, though “I never heard of a court that claimed jurisdiction over natural law.” All they can be judging is, are you alive or dead; because your body has been registered, and as long as it is, there’s an agreement that runs ‘with the land’. (Our bodies are “land”.) We need to unregister our land, and claim our estate. To do that, in my opinion, you need an original writ, under the Great Seal, out of the court of Chancery. That goes into the court of common pleas, where they do what is called a fictitious common recovery. There is a plaintiff nominee, (not you) and a vouchee and a voucher. One of them will give up his claim.
I think you can get someone out of jail with it, because they all have the same flaw; none of them have an original writ under the great seal from the court of Chancery; therefore this case couldn’t be worth more that 40 shillings or 20 dollars. If it’s not worth more than $20, how can anyone go to jail? I think something is being concealed, and I demand it be investigated. I man in Utah went to the county prosecutor with this Plea on a foreclosure that happened two years ago. I haven’t heard back from him, other than that they spoke for an hour. We need to go either to the prosecutor, or to the Sarjeants at law. You can’t bring this to the lower court. All civil matters are appealable to the king’s bench, and that’s where you have to go.
If they ask you ‘where did you get this Plea?’ you can answer, ‘what does it matter? I just want to know, is it lawfull?’
[Regarding the case in Michigan, “Jesse James” has a Personal Protective Order placed against him by his ex-girlfriend, so he wasn’t allowed within her sight. However, she started following HIM, then calling the cops and having him charged. They took away his guns and other items. He’s supposed to get his guns back today. And of course the charges were dropped.]
The court, knowing that Jesse doesn’t know why the Plea works, is trying to get him to re-contract back into their jurisdiction, by trying to get him to wear a tracking device in order to get his guns back. This would be a mistake, potentially a very serious one.23/02/2012 – 00:053
The claims that people have connections to a certain law firm and that this therefore proves some sort of conspiracy is absolutely ridiculous and demonstrates an ignorance of the law.
It would be very odd to have a law firm that didn’t have connections with nearly every other person involved in the law from judges, police and other lawyers. Utter nonsense.26/02/2012 – 15:434
PROOF ! ?
Don’t make me laugh, you really think a little girl and her mother would fight so long and so hard if this didn’t happen ?
You ought to learn to couple your skill in logic with your experience in human nature.
Anonymous wrote:why doesn’t Green and his supporters launch a private prosecution and present his prrof to a court?
I have watched every video and although Green makes a sympathetic case he presents no proof.
I also abhor this idea that a person accuses a number of “powerful” people of such a serious crime and then demands they prove they didn’t do it which is what Green has done.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to FacebookShare to Pinterest